According to @lookonchain, wallets labeled BlackRock received 1,884 BTC (about $204.9M) and 10,585 ETH (about $40.3M) from Coinbase Prime over the last 40 minutes, implying average prices near $108,758 per BTC and $3,808 per ETH. Source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1981018800423329927 Arkham Intelligence corroborates the destination labeling for the BlackRock entity, with the combined notional totaling roughly $245.2M and an average transfer pace around $6.13M per minute during the window. Source: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/blackrock https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1981018800423329927 These flows originated from Coinbase Prime, Coinbase’s institutional platform; traders tracking large on-chain withdrawals can monitor the BlackRock entity page for subsequent inflows or outflows tied to these addresses. Source: https://www.coinbase.com/institutional/prime https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/blackrock

According to EmberCN, a whale bought 7,221 ETH at an average price of $4,036 using 29.146 million DAI within the past 30 minutes, source: EmberCN on X citing Arkham Intelligence. The same wallet reportedly sold 7,818 ETH at $3,714 four days earlier following a drop, source: EmberCN on X citing Arkham Intelligence. Across two October round-trips, the whale is down approximately $8.98 million, source: EmberCN on X citing Arkham Intelligence. For trading, the reported execution zones mark $4,036 as the whale’s fresh on-chain cost basis to monitor and $3,714 as the prior exit level that may act as a reference for liquidity and order flow, source: EmberCN on X citing Arkham Intelligence.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x518C sold 402,005 HYPE for 15.68 million dollars after a nine-month hold, locking in over 5 million dollars in realized profit, source: @lookonchain; hypurrscan.io; intel.arkm.com. The address then bridged the 15.68 million dollars to Solana and purchased 81,117 SOL, confirming a single-address capital rotation into SOL, source: @lookonchain; hypurrscan.io; intel.arkm.com. From the reported figures, the implied average fill is about 193 dollars per SOL, derived from 15.68 million dollars divided by 81,117 SOL, source: @lookonchain; hypurrscan.io; intel.arkm.com. Traders tracking whale-driven flows can monitor this address for subsequent HYPE supply overhang and SOL inflows on Solana to assess near-term liquidity and order-book dynamics, source: @lookonchain; hypurrscan.io; intel.arkm.com.

According to @lookonchain, during the market crash a hacker address panic-sold 9,240 ETH at $3,775 for a total of $34.88M. According to @lookonchain, the realized loss on this dump was $4.56M, which based on @lookonchain's figures equates to roughly a $493 loss per ETH and implies an estimated cost basis near $4,268 per ETH.

According to @EmberCN, two whale/institution addresses sent a combined 17.857 million ASTER worth $22.88 million to centralized exchanges today, split as 9.575 million ASTER to Binance and 8.282 million ASTER to Bybit (source: @EmberCN X post dated Oct 17, 2025). For Whale 1, who previously accumulated 64.535 million ASTER via Gate, a total of 58.608 million ASTER ($92.25 million) has been transferred into Binance over the past week, including 9.575 million ASTER ($12.53 million) today; the address now holds 5.926 million ASTER ($7.42 million), and the author expects this remainder could be cleared by tomorrow morning (sources: @EmberCN; Arkham Intelligence address 0xFB3BF33Ba8E5d08D87B0db0e46952144DF822833). For Whale 2, which joined the WLFI public sale with 10 million USDT for 200 million WLFI, 8.282 million ASTER was withdrawn from Bybit three weeks ago at $2.03 (valued at $16.86 million) and then sent back to Bybit eight hours ago; with ASTER at $1.25 per the author, that tranche reflects an unrealized loss of $6.52 million (sources: @EmberCN; Arkham Intelligence address 0xE549be6f8c3d804b2E76fbEd3f0B45CaF10387f0). From a trading perspective, today’s deposits increased exchange-side ASTER supply by at least 17.857 million from these two addresses; if Whale 1’s remaining 5.926 million is also deposited as the author anticipates, the combined potential exchange-available supply from these two could reach approximately 23.783 million ASTER in the near term (sources: sizes and expectation per @EmberCN; Arkham Intelligence).

According to @OnchainDataNerd, the tracked wallet deposited another 2 million ASTER (about $3 million) to Binance roughly five hours before the post, bringing seven-day cumulative deposits to 40.8 million ASTER (about $68.28 million). Source: @OnchainDataNerd on X, Oct 15, 2025. According to @OnchainDataNerd, the wallet still holds 31.9 million ASTER (about $47.21 million) at address 0xFB3BF33Ba8E5d08D87B0db0e46952144DF822833. Source: @OnchainDataNerd on X, Oct 15, 2025; Arkham Intel explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xFB3BF33Ba8E5d08D87B0db0e46952144DF822833. Large deposits to centralized exchanges increase immediately available supply on order books, a metric traders track for potential sell-side activity. Source: Binance Academy — A Beginner’s Guide to On-Chain Analysis, academy.binance.com. Traders may monitor ASTER exchange inflows, Binance order book depth, and derivatives gauges like funding rate and open interest for confirmation of near-term pressure or absorption. Source: Binance Academy — What Is Open Interest and Funding Rate; Order Book Explained, academy.binance.com.

According to @lookonchain, wallets labeled as hackers bought another 9,240 ETH (~$39.45M) at an average price of $4,269 roughly six hours ago; sources: @lookonchain on X and Arkham Intelligence explorer addresses 0x00C8f061D7723c89dF3A70A2777F324A913193f1, 0xAF8B150f03F820688EB7B83187861a9e014760F0, 0x4a28e2b2A30917826D76d0795B58a7aC66d35722. Traders are monitoring these wallets for any transfers to centralized exchanges, as increases in ETH exchange inflows have historically been associated with higher short-term sell-side volatility; sources: CryptoQuant research on exchange inflows and volatility, and Arkham Intelligence for live address tracking. The reported average cost basis near $4,269 is frequently watched as a potential short-term support/resistance reference by mean-reversion strategies; source: Glassnode Insights on realized price cohorts and local support/resistance behavior. Actionable setup: set alerts for movements from the cited addresses and track ETH netflows and order book liquidity around $4,250–$4,300 to gauge near-term risk and liquidity absorption; sources: Arkham Intelligence for wallet monitoring and Kaiko market microstructure reports on liquidity concentration.

According to @EmberCN, a suspected hacker repurchased 9,240 ETH for approximately $39.45M at $4,269 about five hours prior to the post, after selling 8,960 ETH at $4,382 on Sept 1 for 39.264M DAI; the round trip added 280 ETH in profit, roughly $1.18M at recent prices (source: @EmberCN on X; Arkham Intelligence address pages: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x4FCcF87430FE87571FC50A605627b32D11Fc1086 https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x5c4d2Dd5286E0b9231dBF1ee1E6C8E489f38C6e7 https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xD240d6E834D65E92224ED794d66467bf6d1b84aF). The executed prices delineate an ETH on-chain activity band between $4,269 and $4,382 that traders can reference for near-term levels, as both prices and sizes are verified by the cited Arkham links and @EmberCN’s post (source: @EmberCN on X; Arkham Intelligence). The seller originally withdrew 8,960 ETH from Tornado Cash before selling, and later rotated DAI back into ETH on the buyback, indicating a net return of roughly 39.264M DAI flow into ETH on the latest leg (source: @EmberCN on X; Arkham Intelligence).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a whale/institutional address that accumulated roughly $133 million in ASTER transferred another 6.79 million ASTER to an exchange after a three-day gap, valued around $9.72 million; source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa on Oct 14, 2025 and Arkham Intelligence entity explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/67059888-15dc-4fe8-a238-5d03d4a70513. The address now holds 59.29 million ASTER (about $56.98 million), indicating the amount sent to exchanges has surpassed half of its total accumulated tokens; source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa and Arkham Intelligence entity explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/67059888-15dc-4fe8-a238-5d03d4a70513. Wallet entity reference for verification: Arkham Intelligence intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/67059888-15dc-4fe8-a238-5d03d4a70513; source: Arkham Intelligence.

According to @OnchainLens, a hacker bought 9,240 ETH at an average price of $4,269 using three wallets after spending $39.45M USDC, realizing a profit of 279 ETH worth about $1.18M, source: @OnchainLens, data: Nansen. The holdings are attributed to address 0xD240d6E834D65E92224ED794d66467bf6d1b84aF, source: @OnchainLens, data: Nansen. The executed average purchase level is $4,269 for a total of 9,240 ETH, defining the entity’s reported cost basis and the size of on-chain demand observed, source: @OnchainLens, data: Nansen. Traders can monitor the stated holding address for further large on-chain activity related to ETH flows, source: @OnchainLens, data: Nansen.

According to @52kskew, BTC’s 115K level acted as a key trigger for large players, likely a firm, signaling concentrated participation at that price, source: @52kskew on X, Oct 12, 2025. Traders can prioritize 115K as a critical inflection level to monitor for participation-driven moves and execution timing, source: @52kskew on X, Oct 12, 2025.

According to Onchain Lens, a newly created wallet withdrew 27,159 ETH worth $104.19M from Kraken, and three wallets in total have withdrawn 78,824 ETH worth $302.12M from Kraken, with the flows likely belonging to BitMine and including address 0x2fde430b28f49a9ff87a555376b9c1c28dd60b4c, as posted on Oct 11, 2025 (source: Onchain Lens). According to Onchain Lens, this clustered on-chain outflow removes 78,824 ETH from Kraken-held balances at the time of transfer and was flagged as notable whale activity for trader monitoring (source: Onchain Lens).

According to the source, a social media post claims Bitmine has a $1.9B unrealized loss on its ETH holdings, but it provides no primary-source evidence such as company filings, official statements, or verifiable on-chain addresses, so the figure remains unverified for trading use. Source: user-provided social post. No corroborating links to Bitmine disclosures, regulator filings, or audited reports are included with the claim, limiting reliability for trade execution or risk models. Source: user-provided social post. Traders should seek confirmation via Bitmine’s official announcements, regulatory disclosures, or independently attributed on-chain wallets before positioning around ETH on this headline to avoid headline-driven slippage and mispricing. Source: user-provided social post.

According to @EmberCN, a Pendle multisig wallet claimed 2,322,000 FF worth about $294,000 from FalconStable on Oct 10, 2025, source: @EmberCN X post; Arkham Intel https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xC328dFcD2C8450e2487a91daa9B75629075b7A43. The claimed tokens are associated with address 0xC328dFcD2C8450e2487a91daa9B75629075b7A43, giving traders a direct on-chain handle to track any subsequent movements that could affect FF liquidity, source: @EmberCN X post; Arkham Intel https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xC328dFcD2C8450e2487a91daa9B75629075b7A43. The airdrop was distributed by FalconStable to a Pendle-linked multisig, a fact relevant for monitoring concentration and transfer risk in $FF flows at the referenced address, source: @EmberCN X post; Arkham Intel https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xC328dFcD2C8450e2487a91daa9B75629075b7A43.

According to the source, over 32,000 BTC worth nearly $4B moved on-chain from wallets dormant for 3–5 years, marking the largest such transfer of 2025. Based on the source's data, the update does not specify whether these coins were sent to exchanges, so no direct inference about imminent sell pressure can be drawn solely from this movement. Based on the source's data, traders should await follow-up evidence such as exchange inflows and order-book shifts before positioning for potential BTC volatility.

According to @OnchainLens, in the past 2 hours, @theunipcs deposited 500,000 ATSER (~$983,000) into Euler Finance and borrowed 407,174 USDT to buy 2.54 million $4 (source: @OnchainLens on X, Oct 7, 2025). Over the past 4 days, he has spent $2.17 million USDT to accumulate a total of 13.18 million $4 (source: @OnchainLens on X, Oct 7, 2025). The activity is tied to wallets 0xB16c60e0a93b73CD96bca5b0811715146B3f6Fb4 and 0x89d1b999fcf42b1eac6ed850d0372fc55f623d08 (source: @OnchainLens on X, Oct 7, 2025). Traders can monitor $4 liquidity and price action, along with Euler positions linked to these addresses, given the borrow-funded purchases (source: @OnchainLens on X, Oct 7, 2025).

According to @OnchainLens, a dormant Bitcoin whale holding 691 BTC woke up after 12.5 years and transferred 100 BTC worth approximately $12.49M into two different wallets, highlighting notable whale activity on-chain (source: @OnchainLens). Bitinfocharts address data for 125WeXgyrE4beiEeQewoaXf4H9BL5RiDoP shows the source wallet still holds 591 BTC valued around $73.67M as referenced by the report (source: bitinfocharts.com and @OnchainLens). According to @OnchainLens, the wallet initially received these BTC for $92K in total, implying an average acquisition cost near $133 per BTC based on that figure, underscoring a large unrealized gain that can influence behavior (source: @OnchainLens). Glassnode research on revived supply indicates that movement of long-dormant coins tends to attract market attention and can precede higher volatility, making these transfers tactically relevant for traders to monitor (source: Glassnode Academy, Revived Supply). Chainalysis analysis notes that sustained exchange inflows are commonly used as sell-pressure proxies, so tracking whether the two recipient wallets route funds to known exchange clusters may help gauge near-term supply overhang (source: Chainalysis research on exchange inflows/outflows). The cited post did not indicate an exchange deposit, so near-term monitoring of follow-on hops and address clustering remains the key on-chain signal to watch (source: @OnchainLens).

According to @lookonchain, Matrixport withdrew 5,500 ETH worth approximately $25.66 million from Binance on Oct 6, 2025, with the transfer referenced to address 0xACc74cfaA8AD730194C1828cc179c78d5C08200e; source: @lookonchain; Arkham intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xACc74cfaA8AD730194C1828cc179c78d5C08200e. Arkham’s explorer shows activity for the cited address and a 5,500 ETH inflow around the reported time, corroborating the withdrawal size and timing; source: Arkham intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xACc74cfaA8AD730194C1828cc179c78d5C08200e. Traders often monitor large exchange outflows as reduced immediately sellable supply that can tighten spot liquidity, making exchange reserves a key short-term indicator; source: Glassnode research on exchange balances and market phases. Near term, watch ETH exchange reserves and Binance-specific outflows alongside funding rates and order book depth to gauge follow-through on liquidity and price; source: CryptoQuant exchange reserves and derivatives metrics.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, address 0xB167a69E75eB19868f2D3CCc134C01228F1532E4 withdrew 2,752 ETH from OKX about two hours ago, marking its second withdrawal in a month; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; ARKM Intel explorer. The wallet now holds 3,678 ETH (about $16.56 million) at an average withdrawal price of $4,503, with unrealized profit around $272,000; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; ARKM Intel explorer.

According to @EmberCN, Trend Research sold 9,547 ETH roughly 20 minutes before the post, equating to about USD 43.47 million (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, since starting a second round of ETH reductions on Oct 2, the entity has transferred a total of 70,481 ETH to Binance at an average price of USD 4,397, totaling approximately USD 310 million (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, Trend Research’s on-chain addresses still hold about 82,000 ETH, worth around USD 373 million (source: @EmberCN).